Open Scholarship

Open scholarship is the practice of applying principles of openness throughout the research and scholarly environment. It encompasses both open research and open educational practices.

This site is a hub to support University of Melbourne students and academics in exploring the ways in which they can apply open practice to their teaching and research.

Open Access

Open access (OA) is the term applied to research outputs such as journal articles, monographs, and book chapters, that have been made open to everyone.

Follow the links below to learn more about different ways to open up your research.

Open Research

Open research is not all-or-nothing. You can start with small changes and focus on opening up one particular stage of your research. You can engage with open research from an early stage in your project, such as through preregistering your research study or trial, or you can engage retrospectively by making your published research outputs open access via an institutional or data repository.

There is no set pathway to achieving open research, instead it is about adopting the open practices that make sense for you, your research, and your research communities.

Follow the links below to learn more about different ways to open up your research.

Further Resources

Banner image by Manuel Meurisse on Unsplash.

Article Processing Charges (APC) are charges for making an article open access. In a fully open access journal these may be the only source of income for the journal. In hybrid journals, they are an additional income source to subscriptions.

Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) is the version of the article accepted for publication including all changes made as a result of the peer review process. It has not gone through the journal's copy-editing process. The AAM is the version of the work that can most commonly be deposited in a repository.

Creative Commons are a set of licences that determine what a user or reader can do with an artefact. Copyright owners can apply the appropriate licence to their work to ensure it is as protected or as open as they wish.

Data custodians are responsible for the safe custody, transport, storage of the data and implementation of business rules.

Data Management Plans are a document that sets out the types of data that will be used and generated within a research project and describes how this will be stored, managed and shared. This is a living document and is likely to change throughout the research project. Some funders require a Data Management Plan for a grant application.

Data stewards have accountability and responsibility for data and processes that ensure effective control and use of data assets.

Embargoes are a restriction imposed by publishers on the public release of an AAM. The length of any given embargo is arbitrary, and embargo lengths differ according to funding sources, disciplines and publishers. Libraries spend time determining and implementing embargoes on AAMs deposited to repositories.

Green open access refers to the deposit of an Author Accepted Manuscript into a repository to make it accessible. In some cases, publishers impose an embargo on the public release of the document.

Grey/Gray literature consists of research outputs that sit outside the published literature. Working papers, discussion papers, technical papers, presentations and submissions are some examples of grey literature.

Gold open access is where an author publishes their article in an online open access journal. The article is immediately accessible upon publication, at no charge to the reader, and will be so in perpetuity. To publish in some of these journals, the publisher charges the author’s institution or funding body an Article Processing Charge. However, this is only one business model, and many open access journals will be free to publish in. A comprehensive list of journals is available through the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).

Hybrid open access refers to a publishing model in which subscription-based journals allow authors to make individual articles open access immediately through payment of an Article Processing Charge. Hybrid open access results in “double dipping” where the university pays twice, both for the subscription to the journal and the APC.

Institutional repositories are hosted within an institution to collect the research outputs of that institution. They often collect a broad range of digital items such as articles, books and chapters, reports, grey literature and creative outputs. Institutional repositories historically have been built on software platforms that were open source, such as DSpace or ePrints, but there are now commercial providers in the market, such as bepress (owned by Elsevier) and Pure (owned by Elsevier). The institutional repository of the University of Melbourne is Minerva Access.

Metadata is information about data. It describes the data and allows the data generator and other to understand the data at a later stage.

Minerva Access is the University of Melbourne's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience. Minerva Access is indexed by Google Scholar, and other search engines. It provides view and download statistics and a permanent URL for research outputs.

Elements is the University of Melbourne's research outputs  management system. It is the tool for the collection of and reporting of data on all research outputs published by the University, and the method by which certain outputs are made publicly available in Minerva Access, the institutional repository.

Offsetting agreements are arrangements between publishers and institutions to mitigate the level of extra payments to publishers above subscription costs. They recognise that research-intensive institutions are spending considerable amounts on APCs in addition to subscription costs. Offsetting agreements are usually in place where there is central management of the payment of APCs. Generally Australian institutions do not have many offsetting agreements with publishers.

Open Access refers to the availability of Research Outputs via the internet, such that any user can find, freely access, read and download the output without charge. Any use or reuse is subject to full and proper attribution, and any licence terms stated to apply, such as the Creative Commons suite of licences. Where open licensing (e.g. Creative Commons) permits, users may also copy, distribute, print, search, link, crawl, mine and otherwise use and reuse the Research Outputs both manually and using automated tools. Open access can be achieved through different methods, see definitions of ‘Green Open Access’ and ‘Gold Open Access’.

Pre-print is a version of an article that is shared on a pre-print server such as arXiv, bioRxiv or the like.

Pre-print servers tend to be discipline specific. The longest established pre-print server is arXiv, which has been operating since 1991. Pre-print servers offer a way for authors to share their work and receive comments from other researchers. Generally, pre-print servers will allow the upload of subsequent versions of the work. A Submitted Manuscript may be preceded by multiple versions of a pre-print.

Published research refers to the following categories from the University of Melbourne “Research Outputs collection Classification Guidelines”: A1- Authored research books, A - Other book categories, B1- Research book chapters, B - Other book chapter categories, C1 - Journal articles, refereed, F1 – Conference publications, full written papers, refereed.

Repositories are databases used to share information about research articles and the articles themselves. They generally fall into two categories, institutional repositories and subject based repositories.

Research data is data that is generated in a research project. It is, in itself, a research output. (See definition of Research Data in the Management of Research Data and Records Policy (MPF1242)).

Research Data Management refers to the storage, access and preservation of data produced from a given investigation. Data management practices cover the entire lifecycle of the data, from planning the investigation to conducting it, and from backing up data as it is created and used to long term preservation of data deliverables after the research investigation has concluded. Specific activities and issues that fall within the category of data management include: File naming (the proper way to name computer files); data quality control and quality assurance; data access; data documentation (including levels of uncertainty); metadata creation and controlled vocabularies; data storage; data archiving and preservation; data sharing and reuse; data integrity; data security; data privacy; data rights; notebook protocols (lab or field). RELATED TERM: Data stewards.

Researchers includes all staff employed by the University of Melbourne in a research capacity, including Graduate researchers.

Research outputs are any work produced during the research project. They are diverse in nature and range from research articles, books, book chapters, research data, software, protocols, creative works and others.

Subject repositories are developed by members of a particular discipline. They tend to differ from a pre-print server in that they are a location for the deposit of work rather than providing an ability to comment on the work. Examples include arXiv and Pubmed Central.

Submitted Manuscript is the version of an article sent for peer review. In the past this was sometimes called a pre-print. However, the term pre-prints now has a specific different meaning.

Non Traditional Research Outputs (NTRO) in this context are broader than those NTROs defined by the ARC (https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/ERA/NationalReport/2018/pages/section1/non-traditional-research-outputs-ntros/) and include the following categories from the University of Melbourne “Research Outputs collection Classification Guidelines”: F - Other conference publications, C - Other journal contributions, D - Reference works, G – Reports, J - Original Creative works, Jii – Creative Recorded Works, K - Curated or produced Public Exhibitions and Events.

Version of Record is the final published version of the work. Unless there is a licence that permits sharing of the work, such as a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) licence, then generally this version cannot be shared.

Return to Open Scholarship

The Principles

Questions relating to the Principles for Open Access to Research Outputs at Melbourne

  • Why do we need these Principles?

    The University of Melbourne wishes to encourage the uptake of open access because of the wide-ranging benefits of removing access barriers to research. Making research openly accessible allows for greater reach and influence, both in terms of global academic reach and to those outside of academia such as business, government and community groups.

    It is also important to increase open access output so that the University continues to keep pace with policy requirements of both Australian and overseas funding bodies.

  • Do these Principles align with other policies and statements?

    Yes, the Principles support the Australian Research Council (ARC) Open Access Policy, the National Health and Medical Research Council’s (NHMRC) Open Access Policy and the expectations described by the Australian Code for Responsible Conduct of Research.

    The Principles also support the Australian 2017 Policy Statement on F.A.I.R. Access to Australia’s Research Outputs, driven by the Universities Australia DVCR committee and developed in consultation with a wide array of stakeholders, outlines a set of principles for retaining the highest standards of excellence for research practice.

  • Do the Principles restrict my choice of publication outlet?

    No. The University holds the position that the choice of publication venue is a decision held by the researcher

  • Do the Principles mean I should not publish in an open access journal?

    Of course not. The Principles encourage deposit of your Author Accepted Manuscript in Minerva Access because many researchers publish in subscription journals. However, if the most appropriate outlet for your research is a fully open access journal, then this meets the requirements of the Principles. Keep in mind that while most open access journals do not charge an APC, some do and therefore will require that you have access to funds from your grant or within your department.

  • I’m a Graduate Researcher, does this affect me?

    Yes, for the purposes of the Principles, Graduate Researchers are included as ‘research community’.

  • Why do you refer to ‘peer reviewed’ research?

    A ‘peer reviewed’ research output means where the output itself is peer reviewed, rather than an output appearing in a peer reviewed publication. That is, an opinion piece in a peer reviewed journal is not included in this classification.

  • Are my research outputs included in the Principles on Open Access to Research Outputs?

    Research outputs as defined in the University of Melbourne “Research Outputs Collection Classification Guidelines” (October 2018) are included as follows:

    Research output

    Relevant Principle

    A1- Authored research books

    Principle 6

    A - Other book categories

    Principle 6

    B1- Research book chapters

    Principle 6

    B - Other book chapter categories

    Principle 6

    C1 - Journal articles, refereed

    Principle 6

    F1 – Conference publications, full written papers, refereed

    Principle 6

    M- Software and Datasets

    Principles 7, 8 & 10

    F - Other conference publications

    Principle 9

    C - Other journal contributions

    Principle 9

    D - Reference works

    Principle 9

    E – Editorship

    Not affected by Principles

    G - Reports

    Principle 9

    I - Patents

    Not affected by Principles

    J - Original Creative works

    Principle 9

    Jii – Creative Recorded Works

    Principle 9

    K - Curated or produced Public Exhibitions and Events

    Principle 9

    P – Performance of original Creative Works

    Not affected by Principles

    V- Scholarly Contribution to Database/Website

    Not affected by Principles

  • What is an ‘accredited’ repository?

    The accredited institutional repository of the University of Melbourne, Minerva Access, collects, preserves, and showcases the intellectual output of staff and students for a global audience. For this reason, researchers are encouraged to deposit their work in Minerva Access in the first instance.

    If you work in a field where depositing in a subject repository is preferred, then you can check that it is an accredited repository through ensuring it is registered in Open DOAR, a quality-assured global directory of academic open access repositories.

    If you are looking for somewhere to deposit your research data, the Core Trust Seal site lists data repositories that have been certified as trustworthy. There are also a number of directories that list well-respected and long-established data repositories, such as re3data.org, the FAIRsharing Databases catalogue, and this list of Data repositories from the Open Access Directory (OAD).

  • Why is the time-frame so short?

    Both the ARC and NHMRC require researchers to make the bibliographic information of their publications available in an institutional repository within three months of publication. To ensure that researchers continue to comply with ARC and NHMRC policy, the Principles include the same time frame requirement for deposit of a work.

Practical advice on open access

  • How can I make my work open access?

    Currently there are four primary methods to make work openly accessible:

    1. through the deposit of a copy of the work in an institutional or subject based repository (typically you will be able to deposit the Author Accepted Manuscript)
    2. through the open access publication of the work in a fully open access journal
    3. through the open access publication of the work in a journal under an institutional open access publishing agreement (where there are no author facing APCs).
    4. through the payment of an Article Processing Charge (APC) to make a work openly accessible in an otherwise subscription journal (discouraged by the University of Melbourne)

    The University wishes to limit expenditure on paid open access models where we already have a subscription to the same journals (hybrid journals) and discourages authors from paying Article Processing Charges (APCs) to make outputs open access in hybrid journals. Researchers who wish to publish in subscription journals can make their work openly accessible through the deposit of a copy of their work in the institutional repository, Minerva Access.

  • What systems are available for me to use?

    The University has a well-established Institutional Repository as a means for sharing research outputs openly called Minerva Access. This has been integrated with the University system for managing research outputs and grants, called Elements.

    The University currently has workflows in place to ensure that the deposit of works into the repository is compliant with publisher copyright.

  • Which version of the work do I upload?

    Please deposit your Author’s Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - the final, peer reviewed and corrected version of a paper, before the publisher's copyediting, typesetting and formatting. This version is sometimes referred to as a ‘post-print'.

    Do not deposit the preprint or Submitted Manuscript, the version of an article sent for peer review, as substantial changes may exist between this version and the published version.

    You may only deposit the published version, sometimes known as the Version of Record, if there is a license that permits sharing of the work, such as a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license, or if you own the full copyright of the work.

  • I don’t want to break my agreement with my publisher

    Publishers allow the Authors Accepted Manuscript to be made available in institutional repositories. If there are requirements to keep the output closed down for an embargo period, this will be processed by the Minerva Access team.

  • Does the university provide funds to support OA publication?

    The University does not have a central pool of funds for APCs. However, the University has several open access publishing agreements in place which allow University of Melbourne corresponding authors to publish open access without paying an APC. Each agreement has different terms and conditions so please read all details carefully.

    University of Melbourne researchers also have access to a number of discounts on APCs.

    Please see the Open Access Publishing Agreements page for a list of all current agreements.

    You can ask your Research Office if there are any local arrangements in place. You can also consider budgeting for APCs as a part of your initial grant application.

  • I have already put my work in a repository, do I need to upload it again?

    No. The point of the Principles is to ensure University of Melbourne research is openly accessible. Those researchers who have made their work available in an accredited repository have achieved that end goal, so do not need to do anything further. If you are funded by the ARC and NHMRC, then a record of the work must be deposited into Minerva Access.

  • My research outputs cannot be adequately described in Elements

    We recognise that Elements is much more straightforward for traditional research outputs. Outputs generated from Artistic and Practice-Based Research can be difficult to deposit. If you are having trouble, please contact your the Research Outputs team or Faculty Liaison Librarian.

  • Am I allowed to include third party copyright material in the version I deposit?

    Researchers are responsible for ensuring that they have obtained permission to make third party material available in the open access version of their work. This requires you to negotiate worldwide digital rights to use third party material, as it will be made available online and accessible to everyone. If you cannot get permission to reproduce material in this way, or you cannot afford the fees, you can deposit your work in Minerva Access without the third party content if you feel this does not significantly undermine the work.

  • But no-one will look for my work in Minerva Access!

    Very few people access work in institutional repositories from within the repositories. They are very well indexed, and items are discoverable through many search engines. In fact, 70% of the traffic to Minerva Access comes via Google and Google Scholar. As a demonstration of the discoverability of University of Melbourne open access work, in 2019 and 2020 there were over 1.5 million downloads annually out of Minerva Access.

Research Data

  • I don’t want to share my data

    There are many reasons why researchers don’t wish to or cannot openly share data, including privacy, intellectual property, ethical, and commercial issues. The Principles support sharing research data if you choose, but doesn’t require it, only asking you to make information about the nature and location of your data available.

  • Where can I register my metadata about research data?

    Ideally, information about the nature and location of your research data should be made available in a public data registry or repository. Many journals require datasets be made available on publication. PLOSOne and Nature, for example, both provide lists of recommended data repositories.

    The Core Trust Seal site lists data repositories that have been certified as trustworthy. There are also a number of directories that list well-respected and long-established data repositories, such as re3data.org, the FAIRsharing Databases catalogue, and this list of Data repositories from the Open Access Directory (OAD).

    The University’s data repository, figshare, will accept dataset metadata without making the data available. An example is this dataset about seizure prediction.

At the University

  • Is the University negotiating better deals with publishers?

    From 1 January 2022, numerous open access agreements between the University of Melbourne and different scholarly publishers will be active. For details on these agreements, including transformative and read-and-publish agreements that don't require the payment of author-facing APCs, see the Open Access Publishing Agreements page. APC discounts are also listed on this page.

    Many Australian university library subscriptions are negotiated on a national level through the Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL). CAUL are seeking to negotiate more transformative agreements with publishers in order to improve OA publishing opportunities for Australian researchers. Scholarly Services at the University of Melbourne is also reviewing opportunities to pursue more Open Access publishing deals. If you would like to contribute to this review, please do not hesitate to get in touch with the Scholarly Communications team.

  • How much are we spending on APCs?

    This is difficult to establish, but a recent analysis by the Council of Australian University Librarians indicated that across the country the University of Melbourne is spending the greatest amount on Article Processing Charges with an annual figure of more than $1.4 million in 2017.

  • How much of our research is in Minerva Access? Are people depositing to it?

    University of Melbourne researchers have increasingly been making their research available in Minerva Access. Over the past six years the percentage of deposits to Minerva Access that are openly accessible have risen from below 40% to over 80%.

    According to the Leiden Ranking on open access, University of Melbourne is number 1 in Australia (and 33rd in the world), with 46% of our research output made open. This is an excellent start, but we would like to increase our percentage of work that is open access so that our research is disseminated as widely as possible. Increased visibility is instrumental to research impact.

Help and support

  • Where can I go for help on making my work open access?

    The University provides an array of support to the research community in facilitating open access. In the first instance you should contact your Faculty Liaison Librarian.

  • Is there any help with talking to publishers about permissions to share book chapters?

    It is increasingly common for book publishers to permit deposit of a book chapter in an institutional repository. It is also possible to negotiate these permissions into your publishing contract. If you would like assistance in supporting these discussions with your publisher, please contact your Faculty Liaison Librarian.

  • What training and guidance is available?

    The longstanding and high-quality training and advice provided through key staff members will continue, with additional offering as needed by the community.

    Further information on open access and scholarly publishing is available through the following Libguides:

    Guidance for deposit of research through Elements can be found on the Research Outputs Management page:

    For advice and training requests on open access, please contact your Faculty Liaison Librarian.


Training and Events

Researcher@Library

The Researcher@Library program for graduate researchers and academics will run multiple times in 2022. The program currently includes two sessions focused on open scholarship:

Open Research 101

This session provides a broad overview of the many types of open research. Topics covered include preregistering research, open notebooks, open data, open source code and software, preprints, open peer review, and open access publications.
Sessions: 22 March 2022, 1:00-2:00pm | 25 May 2022, 1:00-2:00pm

Open Access and Your Thesis

Designed for graduate researchers preparing a PhD or Masters by Research thesis, this session provides an overview of open access and copyright for candidates. We cover open access deposit in the University's institutional repository (Minerva Access), embargo and restricted access options, considerations for theses with publications and publishing thesis material after submission, and third-party copyright and permissions.
Sessions: 8 March 2022, 1:00-2:00pm | 11 May 2022, 1:00-2:00pm

Researcher Connect

The University of Melbourne Library also has a number of recordings of past events and training sessions that you can also view at Researcher Connect. The program will run again in 2022 and will include sessions on open scholarship.

Note that the Researcher@Library program and Researcher Connect events are presented for University of Melbourne staff and students only. For more information, email libraryresearch-tickets@unimelb.edu.au.


Parkville Campus

Contact

For more information on the content covered in this website please contact the Scholarly Communications team, listed below. The team are available for individual consultations and group seminars and workshops on Open Scholarship, inclusive of Open Research and Open Educational Resources.

Zachary Kendal

Scholarly Communications Consultant

zachary.kendal@unimelb.edu.au

+61 (03) 8344 2353

Dimity Flanagan

Manager, Scholarly Communications

dimity.flanagan@unimelb.edu.au

+61 (03) 8344 1641

Postal Address

Research Information and Engagement  Level 2, Thomas Cherry Building (Building 201)  The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010